Awhile back, a group of friends
and I discussed the amount of political and social activity
necessary to support the environment, the earth and her
people. We looked at all the activities required to take an
active role in guarding the health of the planet and
speaking up for her people. Who would write letters? Who
would write emails? Who would organize us to voice our
opinion and influence lawmakers closer to home? Would it be
possible for us to create an organization where we could
have one person do what needed to be done for the community?
We’d have to have a salary line to support such a person or
persons.
The idea, though a good one,
just didn’t seem to work. Even amongst us older adults,
there was not one who was interested in actually taking on
the job. Some needed more than a grass-roots income; others
felt the service would require too much; others felt the
task was beyond their understanding.
I feel it would be worthwhile
to organize a cadre of elders who have retired to serve as a
clearinghouse for political and social action, as advocates
for a better life on this planet to create a web of elder
mind and elder caring. Such experienced voices could help us
hear what the issues are, which ones to support, what
rationale and stance to take.
This task of forming a visible
web of actively engaged elders is part of the "November
work" for us (see page 14, From Age-ing to Sage~ing,
©l995, Warner Books). How would it look? In the
social-action arena, some elders could help with
correspondence around local issues, telephoning, some with
filing, some with running errands. Consider paying back (ask
not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do
for your country) and paying forward for future generations.
We could create a core of
retired people to visit prisons —elder home hospice
volunteers, elders reading in the schools. Retirees could
become engaged by passing on their professional experience
and wisdom in all occupations, thus mentoring (giving good
ear and support to) younger workers who are meeting the
challenges of the working world.
These would have two benefits:
recipients of the care from elders would benefit from
personal attention, understanding and experience of the
elder, and the elders themselves would find inspiration and
enthusiasm for the work they do for others.
Giving back to the organization
of the social fabric, we could see a parish, a ghetto, a
neighborhood, a community where elders are naturally
involved. Where elder minds support those who are
breadwinning and do not have time to spare for the daily
tasks that require presence.
Paying it forward, we would
find that when our time comes to be in a retirement home, in
hospice, or diminished in our own home, there would be
people in our community available with loving, caring
friendship. The elders would play a role different than that
of chaplains who visit the sick and home-bound. Chaplains
play a sectarian role with the goal of salvation or
spiritual guidance. I’m talking about elders who have no
such mandate, but who are genuine friends and companions to
peers regardless of sectarian background. These tasks would
require elders with open hearts and patience, understanding,
humor—all of the qualities of spiritual maturity we
encourage with the sage-ing work and contemplative
practices.
This kind of social action
often comes into consideration with clergy who meet to plan
together for the good of the community. But clergy have the
difficult task of teaching and energizing the members of
their communities. An elder group or council, locally, could
assume some of the social support role.